- West Des Moines Car Accident Injury Attorneys
- Phone: 641-792-3595
- Directions
Car accidents in West Des Moines can be complicated on every level, from proving who was at fault in a crash involving a U-turn, to navigating the medical reality that serious injuries often do not surface until hours or days after the collision, to understanding what it means when a physician recommends rhizotomy surgery for persistent back pain caused by the accident. Each of these issues can directly affect whether an injury victim receives fair compensation, how much that compensation is worth, and whether their claim survives an insurance company's attempts to reduce or deny it.
The attorneys at Walker, Billingsley and Bair have more than 28 years of experience representing car accident victims throughout Iowa, including West Des Moines. This guide covers three topics that are critical for any Iowa car accident victim to understand: how fault is determined in accidents involving U-turns, why accident injuries frequently appear after a delay and what that means for a claim, and what rhizotomy surgery is and why it matters in a personal injury or workers' compensation case.
Who Is at Fault in a West Des Moines Car Accident Involving a U-Turn?
U-turn accidents raise fault questions that are not always as straightforward as they first appear. While fault in these accidents often falls on the driver making the turn, that is not a universal rule, and the specific circumstances of each crash matter greatly. Three core factors shape how fault is assigned in any U-turn accident: whether the U-turn was made legally, whether it was made safely, and whether other contributing factors played a role. Learn more about who is at fault in a car accident involving a U-turn and how Iowa law applies to these situations.
Was the U-Turn Legal?
The first question in any U-turn accident analysis is whether the maneuver was legal in the first place. In West Des Moines and across Iowa, a U-turn is generally not prohibited by law unless there is a sign explicitly stating that U-turns are not permitted. However, even without a posted sign, a U-turn can be illegal depending on how it is executed. A common example is making a U-turn from the wrong lane, such as from a middle lane or a right lane rather than the leftmost lane. When a driver executes a U-turn from an improper lane, that factor alone can establish fault regardless of whether a sign prohibited the maneuver.
Was the U-Turn Made Safely?
Legality and safety are separate considerations. A technically legal U-turn can still result in the turning driver being found at fault if the maneuver was not executed safely. Turning in a tight area where there is insufficient space to complete the maneuver cleanly is one example of an unsafe U-turn. Failing to wait for a large enough gap in traffic before beginning the turn is another. Making the turn too slowly and thereby failing to keep up with the flow of traffic, causing a sudden stop, or blocking traffic creates dangerous conditions that can lead to a collision. When a driver's unsafe execution of a U-turn is the cause of a crash, that driver will generally bear responsibility for the resulting damages.
Other Contributing Factors That Can Shift or Share Fault
Even when a U-turn is made both legally and safely, other contributing factors can still result in the turning driver being found fully or partially at fault. A driver who was texting while executing the turn, for example, may be found negligent even if the turn itself was technically proper. A driver who failed to yield to other vehicles, such as drivers turning right with a solid green light or green arrow, may also bear fault even when the U-turn was otherwise legal. Conversely, other drivers involved in the crash may share fault if their own conduct contributed to the accident.
Because there can be numerous extenuating circumstances in U-turn and left-turn accident cases, determining fault often requires a careful review of all available evidence including the police report, witness accounts, dashcam footage, and the physical evidence at the scene. Consulting with a qualified Iowa car accident attorney is the most reliable way to understand how fault may be allocated in a specific crash involving a U-turn.
What If My Car Accident Injuries Did Not Appear Right Away?
One of the most important things any West Des Moines car accident victim needs to understand is that the absence of pain immediately after a collision does not mean no injury occurred. It is entirely common for serious injuries, including those that ultimately require surgery or result in permanent disability, to produce no noticeable symptoms until hours or even a full day after the crash. This reality has significant consequences both medically and legally, and misunderstanding it can cost an injured person their entire claim. Learn more about what to do when accident injuries do not appear right away.
Why Accident Injuries Often Have Delayed Symptoms
The body's physiological response to trauma plays a significant role in delayed pain. In the immediate aftermath of a car accident, adrenaline surges and other hormones such as cortisol are released, which can temporarily suppress the sensation of pain. This is a natural protective mechanism, but it can give accident victims a false sense that they are uninjured when damage has in fact occurred. The experience is similar to the muscle soreness a person feels the day after an intense workout, where the damage is real but the discomfort does not register immediately. Once adrenaline and stress hormones subside, the true extent of the physical impact begins to become apparent.
Seek Medical Care Immediately, Even Without Pain
Regardless of when pain starts, the right course of action after any car accident is to seek medical evaluation promptly. What matters from both a health and legal standpoint is that injuries are documented from the earliest possible moment. Waiting more than one week to seek medical care is not necessarily fatal to a claim, but it will raise a red flag for the insurance adjuster assigned to the case. If a delay in seeking treatment occurred, the injured person should be prepared to explain to their doctor both when the pain started and why they did not seek care immediately. That explanation becomes part of the medical record and can help address the insurer's skepticism.
Going to the emergency room, urgent care, or even a regular physician may feel inconvenient after an accident that did not seem serious at the scene, but failing to seek care can ultimately cost an injured person their entire claim and case.
New Symptoms Appearing After Initial Treatment
Delayed injury symptoms are not limited to the hours immediately after a crash. It is also common for entirely new symptoms and conditions to emerge after initial injuries have been identified and treated. For example, consider a car accident victim who suffers severe neck pain with pain radiating into the right arm, an MRI reveals a herniated disc in the neck requiring surgery, and the surgery resolves the arm symptoms. After recovery, the same patient begins experiencing problems with the right shoulder that were not previously noticeable. This is a recognized phenomenon in which the initial injury's pain is so dominant that it masks underlying damage elsewhere in the body. Once the primary injury is treated and that pain subsides, the previously hidden injury becomes apparent.
The same mechanism can occur when a leg injury causes a person to walk with a limp during recovery. The altered gait places unequal stress on the lower back and hips, which can create new back and hip pain that was not present at the time of the original injury. Similarly, overuse of an uninjured limb while favoring an injured one can create new damage over time.
Every new symptom, no matter when it appears, should be reported to a treating physician as soon as it is noticed. From a legal standpoint, an attorney will typically need to work with the treating physicians to establish a causation opinion connecting each new condition to the original accident. A causation opinion that rises only to the level of ""possible"" is not sufficient under Iowa law to support a compensation claim. The injured person bears the burden of proving it was more likely than not that the original accident caused each condition for which compensation is sought. Experienced attorneys know how to work with physicians to obtain the level of opinion the law requires.
Cumulative Trauma and When Injuries Worsen Over Time
Some car accident injuries worsen gradually over time rather than presenting with immediate acute symptoms. This is sometimes described as cumulative trauma, a condition that develops or intensifies through repeated stress on an already-injured structure. A back injury sustained in a car accident, for example, may initially produce manageable discomfort that grows progressively worse over weeks or months. It is important that the connection between the original accident and the worsening symptoms is clearly documented in the medical record from the earliest point possible.
Rhizotomy Surgery for Back Pain After a Car Accident in West Des Moines
For West Des Moines car accident victims who develop chronic back pain following their crash, rhizotomy surgery is a treatment option that may provide significant and lasting relief when other methods have failed. Understanding what the procedure involves, who is a candidate, and what it means from a legal and financial perspective is important for anyone facing this diagnosis after a collision. Learn more about rhizotomy surgery for back pain after a car accident in Iowa.
What Rhizotomy Surgery Is and How It Works
Rhizotomy is a surgical procedure used to treat facet joint syndrome, spinal arthritis, or spondylosis, conditions that often develop or are aggravated by car accident trauma, particularly in rear-end collisions. The facet joints are located at the back of the spine and are responsible for the stability and flexibility of the spinal column. When these joints are injured, such as when a vehicle is struck from behind while stopped in traffic, the resulting inflammation can press against the spinal cord and cause pain that may radiate into other areas of the body.
In the rhizotomy procedure, the surgeon uses X-ray imaging as a guide to identify the specific spinal nerve roots responsible for the patient's pain. A needle with an electrode at its end is inserted and positioned next to the affected facet joint. Heat is then applied to the nerve root, destroying the nerve and eliminating its ability to transmit pain signals to the brain. Most patients experience pain reduction within a few hours of the procedure. The duration of pain relief can range from a few months to many years depending on the individual patient and the specific nerve roots treated.
Recovery and Considerations for Rhizotomy Patients
There are two primary forms of the rhizotomy procedure, and they carry different recovery requirements. The standard rhizotomy is an inpatient procedure that typically warrants at least one overnight stay in the hospital. Patients who undergo this form of the surgery will almost immediately begin physical therapy after the operation. Pain medication is commonly needed to manage post-operative discomfort during recovery. A facet rhizotomy using a radiofrequency probe is a less invasive outpatient procedure that does not require an overnight hospital stay. Patients should discuss with their physician which approach is appropriate given their specific condition and circumstances.
As with any surgical procedure, rhizotomy carries risks, including the possibility of nerve damage and changes in sensation at the treated area. Patients should have a thorough discussion with their surgical team about all potential risks before consenting to the procedure. Not all car accident victims with back pain are candidates for rhizotomy. Patients are thoroughly evaluated to identify any medical complications that could arise during the procedure, to assess their response to anesthesia, and to determine that other treatment options including injectable therapies and physical therapy have already been exhausted. Rhizotomy is most often recommended for extreme cases where the injured person experiences significant difficulty with mobility or severe nerve-related symptoms that have not responded to conservative care.
Rhizotomy as a Compensable Medical Expense After a Car Accident
When a car accident caused by another driver's negligence leads to the back injuries that necessitate rhizotomy surgery, the cost of that procedure is a recoverable element of damages in the personal injury claim. Medical bills for rhizotomy, related physical therapy, prescription medications, diagnostic imaging, and follow-up care are all compensable expenses that should be carefully documented and included in any demand or claim. In addition to medical costs, the injured person may be entitled to compensation for lost wages during recovery, reduced earning capacity if the back injury has long-term effects on the ability to work, and damages for pain and suffering.
For accident victims who were injured while on the job and are pursuing a workers' compensation claim in addition to or instead of a personal injury claim, additional rules apply regarding treatment authorization. In workers' compensation cases, the employer typically has the right to choose the treating physician, and procedures such as rhizotomy must be approved by the employer-chosen doctor before the cost will be covered. Undergoing surgery without that approval can result in the cost not being covered under workers' compensation benefits. Back injuries like facet joint syndrome are classified as unscheduled member disabilities under Iowa workers' compensation law, which means more than just the impairment rating is taken into account when calculating permanent partial disability benefits.
Seeking Legal Assistance in West Des Moines
Seeking legal counsel from experienced West Des Moines Iowa car accident attorneys such as those at Walker, Billingsley & Bair can provide invaluable support in filing insurance claims or pursuing personal injury lawsuits. With a comprehensive understanding of Iowa law, their team can help gather evidence, establish liability, and secure the compensation deserved by accident victims.
Suffering from the aftermath of a car accident shouldn't impede your pursuit of justice and fair compensation. The Iowa injury lawyers at Walker, Billingsley & Bair work hard to level the field between injured Iowans and insurance companies.
That's why we provide this FREE book; The Legal Insider's Guide to Iowa Car Accidents: 7 Secrets to Not Wreck Your Case. To learn more about what our legal team will do to help you protect your Iowa injury claim, contact Walker, Billingsley & Bair to schedule a no-cost consultation. Call 641-792-3595 to order your free accident book today.